On the example of two representatives of popular brands, we will try to figure out which multivarker is better: Redmond or Polaris. And we will understand, looking at the model M90 and PMC 0517AD, respectively. The fact is that both representatives seem to be the same both in design and in the offered functions, but at a cost they are different - Redmond will cost from 200 cu, and Polaris - from 130 cu. Let's see what the producers offer us and what is the difference.
Related materials:
- Which multivark is better: Redmond or Panasonic
- How to choose a multivark for the house - we buy a kitchen assistant
- Which multivarker is better
Look and feel of the
Both models are made in the classic, simple style with streamlined shapes and a comfortable handle. They have a touch control, the panel is located on the front, each program and function are available in one touch. Let's look at the bowl volume and power.
| Parameters | "Redmond" | "Redmond" | "Polaris" |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume of the bowl | 5 liters | 5 liters | |
| Power | 860 W | 860 W |
As you can see, here the parameters of the multivariate are the same, this means that both representatives will take the same amount of ingredients and preparedish for the same amount of time. The bowls of the models have a special ceramic non-stick coating and handles that will simplify the operation of the device.
Read also:
- Which bowl for multivarkers is better
Heating technology and cooking programs
How is the process of preparing dishes, and what "arsenal" of automatic programs have data from multivarkers.
Redmond
Works on the technology of heat treatment without pressure and realizes a modern and uniform 3D heating.
Polaris
Heating is carried out using 3D technology, ensuring a uniform cooking of each dish.
See also:
- What multivarka better induction or Tenova
| Redmond | Polaris | |
|---|---|---|
| Express cooking | Milk porridge | |
| Soup | Soup | |
| Milk porridge | Frying | |
| Extinguishing | Pasta | |
| Frying | Baking | |
| Pasta | Baking | |
| Steamer | Yogurt | |
| Baking | Pizza | Pizza |
| Pilaf | Stewing | |
| Varka | Dessert | |
| Bread | Groats | |
| Dessert | Oatmeal | |
| Yoghurt | Beans |
The availability of automaticprograms, both multivarks will please every consumer, and the difference is only in the presence of the program "bread" from the multivarka Redmond. If you want to buy a device that can make a muffin, you can safely choose a representative of Redmond. For all other functions the multivarques are equal.
See also:
- Which is better: multivark or bread maker
| Features | Redmond | Redmond |
|---|---|---|
| Heating function | is | is |
| Maintenance of temperature | is | is |
| Delayed start | is | is |
The Redmond model is also equipped with the function of "auto heat out cut-off" - if the dish is cooked at low temperature and you do not need the functionheat support, you can turn it off before cooking, and the appliance will automatically turn off when your dish is ready.
Both models have in their arsenal the function of "Multi-Cook", which will allow to cook any dishes with a temperature from 35 to 170 degrees. Given the number of functions, choose which is better - Redmond or Polaris, will be quite difficult.
Package Contents
Let's see what additional accessories we offer manufacturers.
| Redmond | Polaris |
|---|---|
| Measuring cup | Measuring Cup |
| scoop and spoon | Two spoons |
| container steaming | container steaming |
| Fryer | Yogurt Containers |
| Stand | container for condensate |
| Book | cookbook |
recipes in mattersthe equipment of each model, we see that the representative of Redmond will be able to please you with dishes in deep fat, and the multivariate from Polaris - useful yoghurts.
Choosing between two practical and reliable models, it is necessary to base only on additional "highlights".For example, if the availability of bread baking is decisive for you, Remond will be an ideal solution. If you want to buy an inexpensive but functional model that can prepare yogurt - choose Polaris.
