In order for us to determine which multivarker is better - Redmond or Philips, let's take as an example of bright and popular representatives of these trademarks with a price range of $ 100.The representative of Redmond is a model of the RMC-M30 series, the representative of Philips is model HD3033.
See also:
- Which multivarche is better than
- What's better: multivarker or multivarker-pressure cooker
Appearance
Redmond
The multivarker looks stylish in metallic color with a white lid. The display is located conveniently and you can see the proposed programs on it. The lid is opened easily - with one turn of the hand.
See also:
- Which Multivar is Better: Polaris or Redmond
- Which Multivar is Better: Redmond or Panasonic
- Which Multivar is Better: Redmond or Molinex
Philips
The pleasant white color of the multivarker will adorn any kitchen, the body of the model is made of plastic. The difference between the device is the "streamlined" angles and sloping lines, as well as the presence of a handle for convenient movement of the device. The display is located on the front panel.
- See also: What is the best multivariate: Panasonic or Philips
Availability of
programs Let's see what they have in their arsenal of multivars.
| Redmond | Phillips |
|---|---|
| Cooking | Soup |
| Milk porridge | porridge / rice |
| Soup | Frying |
| Buckwheat | Steamer |
| Frying | Baking |
| Extinguishing | Spaghetti |
| Rice / grain | |
| Pilaf | |
| Pastry / yogrut | |
| Baking |
Both presented models can easily preparecutlets, fish and garnish for steaming, vegetable soup and compote, milk porridges from any kind of cereals, steaks and steaks, muffins, casseroles and biscuits.
The Redmond Multivara boasts the preparation of desserts( jelly, jam), pilaf from seafood or meat, as well as jellied. And the model Philips will please fans of Italian cuisine by preparing spaghetti and pasta. Choosing what is best - Redmond or Phillips can be guided by their culinary preferences.
- See also: Multivark - pros and cons
Functional features of
Let's see what functions are used by the most popular models of multivarieties.
| Redmond | Philips |
|---|---|
| Heating | Delayed start( up to 12 hours) |
| Maintenance of temperature | Heating |
| Delayed start( up to 24 hours) | Setting time |
Here we see that both models are almost equal - they can heat up the already prepared dish and cook it yourselfdinner or breakfast. A representative of Redmond will be able to keep the temperature for a few more hours so that you enjoy only fresh dishes, and the Philipps model is equipped with the "time setting" function so that you can submit a fresh lunch to the minute.
See also:
- Do you need a multivarker in the house: seven reasons in favor of the kitchen assistant
- Battle of the arguments - is it worth buying a multidisk
Completion of the
Now we look at what we are offered to buy manufacturers complete with a multivar.
| Redmond | Phillips |
|---|---|
| Steamed container | Steamed container |
| Measuring cup | Measuring cup |
| Spoon | Two spoons |
| Scoop | Silicone mittens |
| Recipe book | Recipe book |
As you can see, both models are equal, and the difference is onlyin the presence / absence of mittens and scoop.
Distinctive features of
In addition to the basic functions, each model has its own distinctive features. Perhaps, deciding which multivark to choose, you will be guided by these features.
| Redmond | Phillips | |
|---|---|---|
| Bowl | non-stick coating | Teflon coating |
| Power | 900W | 980 W |
| volume pots | 6 liters | 4 liters |
| Management type electronic | electronic | |
| function avtomaticheskogootklyucheniya | no | have |
| uniform heating of the bowl | have | there are |
Both models are equipped with convenient and useful functions, and the choice in favor of one or another assistant in the kitchen should be done, based on their needs. With the multivariate Redmond, you can cook almost any dish in a large enough number that Phillips can not boast.
The cookbook of recipes in the Philips model contains fewer dishes than Redmond's and, as the reviews show, Philips recipes contain many inaccuracies, which can not be said of Redmond. But the configuration of the Philips model is more thoughtful and convenient.
Both models quickly prepare food, due to the practical arrangement of heating elements. Also, both models can be called the optimal choice for the price-quality ratio, for a low cost you will get a quality and useful device.
